Nest Group Logo








HIC Column Method Development HIC Column Method Development

For your convenience, we accept Mastercard, VISA, and American Express credit cards.


| Home | IdeaBook | Orders | Price/Applic | Price/Vendor | Protocols|

Overview

The expanded family of HIC column chermistries from PolyLC™, Inc. now includes the LC-MS capable PolyBUTYL A™, PolyPENTYL A™, PolyHEXYL A™, PolyHEPTYL A™, PolyOCTYL A™, PolyNONYL A™, and PolyDECYL A™ to span the widest range of hydrophobicities to address the needs in Top Down proteomics. Compared to other hydrophobic interaction chemistries, the PolyLC HIC chemistries (PolyMETHYL A™ through PolyDECYL A™) are extremely responsive to small changes in salt concentration. By approaching binding and loading conditions empirically, one can witness dramatic increases in resolving capacity. The newest additions, BUTYL through DECYL, on 1500Å pore, 3µm silica, open application of HIC to LC-MS of intact proteins, facilitating Top Down proteomic studies.

  HIC-MS for Top Down Proteomics.

HIC-MS for Top Down Proteomics

HIC is an extension of reverse phase chromatography (RPC) where the polarity of the mobile phase is increased by the addition of salt. The more polar the solvent, the longer the retention. A partitioning occurs into the HIC, weakly hydrophobic, phases as the surface water on the protein is displaced by salt, thus making the protein more hydrophobic.
The overriding reason HIC is used is to avoid the denaturing of proteins. In RPC, the organic solvents required to elute proteins can denature the sample. Or the sample sticks too well to these substantially more hydrophobic surface chemistries and the RPC solid support then denatures the sample.
MS-compatible, ammonium tartrate (and ammonium acetate) salt is especially useful for on-line HIC-MS. It has selectivity comparable to that of ammonium sulfate. Furthermore, the selectivity obtained with it is orthogonal to that of RPC.

Conditioning new columns

Before you use your column on a day to day basis, these columns should be "conditioned," a process which enhances the conformational sensitivity of the packing for better separations. This dynamic chemistry is stored in organic solvent, and when first presented with an aqueous solvent it undergoes a reversible conformational change, increasing the column's sensitivity to the conformation of the protein. (Mfg. Instruction Sheet)

Perform the conditioning process by flushing the column with the following eluents in the sequence described below:

  • 10 c.v. of water
  • 5 c.v. of a high salt/buffer
  • 5 c.v. of a low salt/buffer
  • 10 c.v. of a high salt/buffer to equilibrate prior to sample loading

    Methods development

    To best determine how changes in salt concentration will affect your separation, we recommend you start your methods development with the fastest elution conditions and incrementally increase the salt composition of the gradient run-by-run. Simultaneously, the salt concentration of the sample should be proportionally increased by dilution with the high salt solution (solvent A) (minimum 25% sample v/v.)

    If using a guard column as a methods development column, gradient times should be shortened to 5-8 minutes; the flow rate should remain at the appropriate ml/minute analytical level. (This way you can accomplish 4-6 experiments in one hour (including flushing and equilibration) speeding up methods development, since a column void volume will take 20 seconds). The relationship of flow rate to the internal diameter of analytical columns can be determined from our scaling factor table for columns.

    First, make an injection under the low salt strength conditions to assure that the protein will elute. If considerable delay in retention is seen, increase the rate of solubilization and release from the column by lowering the buffer to 10 mM, or use detergent or 1-5% organic solvent in both reservoirs.

    If the protein elutes in the void volume then use stepwise increases (i.e. 500 mM, 1.0 M, 1.5 M then 2.0 M salt) of the high salt conditions (solvent A) until the binding profile doesn't change. This will assure sample binding, shorter operation times and minimize the risk of precipitation or irreversible conformational changes of the proteins.

    Because proteins are sorted by surface hydrophobicity rather than total contact hydrophobicity, you can change the water of hydration by adding or deleting small amounts of salt to cause subtle changes in their surface hydrophobicity. Structure promoting salts in the Hofmeister series (citrate>tartrate>sulfate> phosphate>chloride) increase the ability of these columns to retain and discriminate between proteins or peptides by affecting the surface hydration and conformation (note that as few as 9 amino acids are necessary to form a beta-pleated sheet and 30 can form an alpha helix.) Using different alkyl chain length columns will then maximize these differences, depending upon the accessibility of the hydrophobic pockets of the proteins.

    If trying HIC for intact protein LC-MS on the PolyBUTYL A, PolyPENTYL A or PolyHEXYL A, volatile buffers, such as ammonium acetate, will be required.

    A dramatic example of this methods development technique working better than a single linear gradient from high salt, was in the isolation of anti-Factor VIII from ascites fluid. It was achieved by determining that the separation of anti-Factor VIII from other blood proteins on the PolyPROPYL A column could be achieved if started at 1.0 M salt. If the gradient started at 1.3 M salt they co-eluted at 800-700 mM salt.

    If sulfate is not available or the baseline excursions from viscosity changes in the UV detector are unsatisfactory, initial operation with phosphate gradients has been shown to be a good alternative. If the protein is sensitive to sulfate, use of 1.2 M potassium citrate is recommended, but then use 280 nm for UV detection. Alternatively, fluorescence detection (280ex, 330em ) will avoid all baseline changes from impurities or refractive index effects on the UV detector.

    Application of the sample should be in the smallest practical volume (< 5% ) and in the most concentrated salt solution as possible without precipitating the proteins outside of the column. Make up a 0.1 M buffer/salt solution to dissolve the sample and dilute it with the strong salt solution to the desired concentration for injection (minimum 25% sample v/v) to promote retention to the head of the column. The capacity of the packing is high (400 mg/gm for batch adsorption) and a column should be able to handle 1-5 mg of protein in a high resolution separation of moderate complexity.

    In the "unusual" circumstance where a perfect separation is not obtained on the first injection:

    To Increase Retention:

  • Raise the temperature.
  • Change from the ammonium to a sodium salt.
  • Use a longer chain length (ALKYL) Aspartamide (e.g.pentyl) chemistry.
  • Increase the salt concentration of the sample.
  • Increase the salt concentration of the solvent.
  • Use a better structure promoting salt (Citrate>Tartrate>Sulfate>Phosphate)

    To Decrease Retention:

  • Use a shorter chain length (ALKYL) Aspartamide (e.g. methyl).
  • Decrease the salt concentration of the solvent.
  • Use small amounts of sucrose, glycol, or propanol in solvent A & B (<5%)
  • Use of Octyl Glucoside, CHAPS, and CHAPSO work well (below their CMC) although use of hydrophobic detergents is not recommended
  • Change the pH of the buffer to increase the ionic character of the peptide.

    Reversed phase and HIC polarity considerations

    The use of these columns as reverse phase columns is possible although the very hydrophilic coating will be weakly retentive relative to a C3 RPC column and they will not tolerate TFA in the mobile phase. The polarity of the peptidic surface chemistry is quite varied as compared to other HIC columns. The PolyETHYL Aspartamide HIC is about 60% as retentive as the PolyPROPYL Aspartamide HIC, and the PolyMETHYL Aspartamide HIC is only 18% as retentive as the PolyPROPYL Aspartamide based on relative retention times.

    Selection of a column is quite empirical, although if the protein is soluble without detergents the PolyPROPYL Aspartamide column is probably the best choice. For larger proteins and MaB the PolyBUTYL A (for ADC's) and the PolyPENTYL A for large proteins are suitable.

    Instructions for day-to-day use

    The following are typical operating conditions for non-LC-MS systems. It is recommended that you filter all mobile phases and samples to avoid plugging the inlet frits.

    A: 100% 2.0M (NH4)2SO4 + 0.1M K-PO4, pH 6.5

    B: 100% 0.1M K-PO4, pH 6.5; 0-100%B, linear, 40 min (15 column volumes), 1.0 ml/min.

    1.  Flush with 5 c.v. of the high salt buffer
    2.  Condition with 5 c.v. of the low salt buffer  
    3.  Perform analysis with decreasing salt gradient
    4.  Flush with 5 c.v. H2O at end of day and plug the column ends. 
    5.  Store in H2O for up to 4 days.  If the column is to be stored for
    longer than 4 days, store it in methanol.  When it is to be used again
     after methanol storage, prepare the column as described in 
    "Conditioning new columns" to reproduce earlier results.  
    

    A pH range of 3.0-7.0 is recommended since these columns are based on 300Å silica, chemically bonded with a polymeric amide (peptide like) chemistry. The capacity of the packing is high (400 mg/gm for batch adsorption) and a 4.6 x 200mm analytical column should be able to handle 1-5 mg of protein in a high resolution separation of moderate complexity. Use the scaling factor table to determine the expected capacity of your column.

    To elute proteins with unusually strong hydrophobic character, detergents or solvent compositions of 50% organic may be used in the gradient without detrimental effects to the packing's surface chemistry. However, to obtain longest column life, exercise care when using organic solvents to prevent precipitation of salts. Do not use TFA or strong acids in the mobile phases on these columns since the peptidic bonded phase could be damaged.

    Storage and cleaning

    At the end of the day, flush the analytical column with at least 5 c.v. of distilled water. To remove strongly retained components DMSO is preferred to guanidinium chloride. Injected in 5% c. v. aliquotes under no salt conditions. If the column is to be left for more than 4 days, storage in 100% methanol is recommended.

    Part Numbers and Prices

    See PolyPENTYL A for HIC-MS of intact large proteins, or PolyPROPYL, PolyETHYL, or PolyMETHYL A for HPLC of proteins.


    Copyright© 1995-2017 The Nest Group, Inc.™ All rights reserved (established 1984)

    For more information or to place an order contact:
    The Nest Group, Inc.™ · 45 Valley Road · Southborough, MA  01772-1323
    Tel: 800-347-6378 or 508-481-6223 · Fax: 508-485-5736
    For your convenience, we accept Mastercard, VISA, and American Express credit cards.


    | Home | IdeaBook | Orders | Price/Applic | Price/Vendor | Protocols|

    If you have problems or comments concerning our WWW service, please send an e-mail to Amos Heckendorf, webmaster.

     
    About Us | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | Contact Us

    Last Updated: 10/26/17